News & Neuigkeiten » Patriots coach Bill Belichick and team owner

Residents of San Diego have voted against building a new Chargers stadium funded by an increase in hotel tax. A two-thirds majority was required for Ballot Measure C to pass, but with over 85% of votes counted, the number was only at 42.5%. NFL Week 9 Grades It is a positive report for most of the NFC South, but problems persist for the Green Bay Packers. In an open letter, Team owner Dean Spanos thanked the Chargers fanbase, but was non-committal on the future of the franchise. Despite the fact that Measure C failed to receive a two-thirds majority, I wanted to reach out right away with a very sincere thank you for your loyal support as a fan and for considering our initiative.In terms of what comes next for the Chargers, its just too early to give you an answer. We are going to diligently explore and weigh our options, and do what is needed to maintain our options, but no decision will be announced until after the football season concludes and no decision will be made in haste. The ballot required 66.7% of the vote to pass but received only 42.5% The ballot proposed that the $1.8billion stadium would be funded in the majority by increasing hotel occupancy tax from 12.5% to 16.5%, raising $1.15billion, combined with a $650million joint pledge from the NFL and Chargers organisation.Spanos had proposed a Super Bowl ready stadium, combined with convention centre and music venue, which could be available for other events 300 days a year. However, the defeat spells uncertainty for the future of the Chargers. The team currently play in the outdated Qualcomm Stadium, which they have inhabited since 1967. The Qualcomm Stadium has hosted Chargers games since 1967 The organisation has the opportunity to move out of San Diego and join the Los Angeles Rams at their new facility in Inglewood. However, Spanos had been committed to staying in San Diego, and changed his stadium plans in an attempt to convince mayor Kevin Faulconer. Despite Faulconers support, residents have opted against the ballot, and Spanos now has until January 15 to make a decision whether to follow the Rams. Should the Chargers decide not to move upstate, the Oakland Raiders also have an option on a ground share with the Rams.The uncertainty will make it an uneasy second half of the season for Chargers fans, who will hope there is still NFL to watch in San Diego come 2017. Also See: WATCH: Sunday Blitz Latest standings NFL week nine highlights RESULT: Week 10 game choice Quincy Williams II Womens Jersey . -- Adrian Peterson remained in a walking boot to treat a high ankle sprain on his left leg on Wednesday, and coach Leslie Frazier said he will not play on Sunday against Atlanta if he cant hit the practice field in the next two days. Nick Foles Womens Jersey . The 17-time Grand Slam champion, who lose three straight finals in Monte Carlo to Rafael Nadal from 2006-08, has not played in the tournament since 2011, when he lost to Jurgen Melzer in the quarterfinals. http://www.authenticjaguarslockroom.com/Youth-Jalen-Ramsey-Elite-Jersey/ . - Jordan Addesis shootout goal helped the Plymouth Whalers to a 3-2 win over the Sault Ste. Jalen Ramsey Jersey . It was a move of some time in the making. “He hasnt thrown well, clearly some guys are being used more than him right now and the only way to get out of this funk is to pitch,” said general manager Alex Anthopoulos. Ryquell Armstead Jersey . PAUL, Minn.FALL RIVER, Mass. - Lawyers involved in the murder trial of former New England Patriots star Aaron Hernandez want to know if there are any die-hard Patriots fans in the jury pool.They also have asked more than 1,000 potential jurors whether the fact that Hernandez played for the NFL would make them feel he was more likely to be guilty, and how much they know about the case.Prospective jurors filled out the questionnaire during the first phase of jury selection in Bristol County Superior Court, which spanned three days and ended Tuesday. The court released the 51-question form late Tuesday afternoon.Hernandez has pleaded not guilty to murder for the June 2013 shooting death of Odin Lloyd, a semiprofessional football player who was dating the sister of Hernandezs fiancee.Several of the questions focused on Hernandezs status as a football player.Does the fact that Mr. Hernandez was a professional football player make you feel that he is more likely to be guilty of the charges in this case than an individual that did not play football professionally would be? read one question.It also asked whether the person is a Patriots fan; if so, for how long; whether he or she has attended a game and if so, how many.The questionnaire informs prospective jurors that the case will draw a high degree of media attention and that they will be barred from posting anything about the case on Facebook, Twitter or other social media or elsewhere online.Would you be able to abide by these rules for the entirety of the trial? potential jurors were asked.Several questions focussed on their familiarity with the case, ranging from never having heard about it to following it closely.ddddddddddddIt asked where they got their information, listing more than 50 media outlets, from the local Fall River News to the National Enquirer, as well as social media and other sources.Judge Susan Garsh told prospective jurors before they completed the questionnaires that they still might be called as jurors if they had heard of the case or knew one of the witnesses.They were asked if they knew any of 300 people listed as potential witnesses or others whose names might come up during trial, including Patriots coach Bill Belichick and team owner Robert Kraft.Potential jurors were also questioned about their feelings on race and ethnicity. Hernandez is Hispanic, Lloyd was African-American, and Hernandezs fiancee, Shayanna Jenkins, is African-American.The questionnaire also asks if potential jurors are gun owners, their views on marijuana use and whether they feel Hernandez is more likely to be guilty because he has tattoos.Also Tuesday, the judge turned down a request from CNN that the questioning of prospective jurors be done in a way that the public can hear. CNN expressed concerns that Garshs plan to question prospective jurors out of the publics hearing violates the First Amendment. But Garsh responded that Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court found it was constitutional to question jurors out of the publics hearing, as long as the public could see the proceeding.Individual questioning of jurors is expected to start Friday. ' ' '